Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Mascara-induced nasolacrimal duct obstruction
  1. Paolo Scollo1,
  2. Rhys Davies1,
  3. Dominic O'Donovan2 and
  4. Cornelius Rene1
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2Department of Neuropathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr Paolo Scollo; paolo.scollo{at}cantab.net

Abstract

A 35-year-old woman underwent left external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) following a recent bout of left acute dacryocystitis. She had a right DCR 14 years earlier. Her relatively young age of presentation prompted suspicion of secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and, although the left lacrimal sac appeared macroscopically normal peroperatively, a lacrimal sac biopsy was taken. Histopathology revealed florid chronic inflammation, with abundant granular brown pigment and polarisable crystals suggestive of an exogenous material in the lacrimal sac mucosa compatible with mascara. After initial improvement, her epiphora has recurred 1-year postoperatively, but her ocular discharge has resolved. Mascara-induced conjunctival pigmentation is well established. However, there are very few published reports of nasolacrimal duct obstruction due to mascara. Since cosmetic application of mascara and kohl eyeliner is widespread, patients and practitioners should be aware of their potential to migrate into the lacrimal apparatus and cause chronic inflammation with secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

  • ophthalmology
  • pathology
  • plastic and reconstructive surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors PS: the main author of work, including researching literature, planning manuscript and writing original drafts. RD: second author contributing to writing and editing drafts of manuscript. DOD: provided writing and supervision for all histopathological elements of manuscript as well as preparing figures. CR: overall supervisor for project, edited final drafts, obtained consent and arranged for patient perspective contribution.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.