Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Acquired bilateral atrio-ventricular valvular stenosis in a complex single-ventricle physiology following superior cavo-pulmonary connection
  1. Aakash Vijay,
  2. Ankit Jain,
  3. Anwar Hussian Ansari and
  4. Devesh Kumar
  1. Cardiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, DL, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Devesh Kumar; devesh2.dk{at}gmail.com

Abstract

A young female in her early 20s with complex congenital heart disease, previously treated with pulmonary valvotomy and a bidirectional Glenn procedure (for hypoplastic right ventricle, severe pulmonary stenosis and ASD) presented with worsening dyspnoea (NYHA IV), anasarca, fever and cough. Examination revealed atrial fibrillation, hypotension, cyanosis, anasarca and a mid-diastolic murmur. 2D transthoracic echocardiography showed bi-atrial enlargement with thickened mitral and tricuspid valves with severe mitral and tricuspid stenosis. Due to refractory shock despite medical management, mitral and tricuspid valve percutaneous balloon dilation was performed, leading to an improvement in haemodynamics, allowing her to be weaned off support and discharged after 3 days.

  • Valvar diseases
  • Interventional cardiology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors The corresponding author is the guarantor of the entire work. All three authors have been actively involved in the patient care and the final draft of this paper. DK is the guarantor for all the data and the entirety of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.